Product Comparison: Koofr vs. Icedrive

Updated March 2023 with Koofr's new 5XXL (5 TB) plan

Koofr and Icedrive are both cloud storage providers based in Europe (Slovenia and the UK, respectively) focused on privacy and security. While both providers have a similar core offer, there are a number of features that set them apart. In this post, we'll try to cover these differences to help you figure out which of these services is best for you.

Pricing and plans

You can get started with either Koofr or Icedrive (or both!) for free. Both providers offer a free plan with 10 GB of storage space and limited features.

As for paid plans, Koofr offers a variety ranging from 10 GB to 20 TB in storage space, which is counted in addition to the 10 GB included in the free plan. In addition to the increased storage space, higher-tier plans also include some premium features, which we'll get to later. Subscriptions are available on a yearly basis, and users can upgrade their plans whenever they need more storage.

Currently, only yearly subscriptions are supported.

*prices as of 20. 3. 2023. Current prices are always available on our pricing page.

Icedrive offers three tiers of paid plans, which can be purchased on a monthly, yearly, or lifetime basis. You can get started with a free plan which includes 10 GB of storage space and a bandwidth limit of 3 GB per day.

*prices as of 27. 7. 2022.

Verdict: Icedrive has lower prices for the same amount of storage, but Koofr offers more storage sizes and unlimited bandwidth.

Privacy and personal data

Koofr and Icedrive are both based in Europe, so they are both subject to tough privacy laws. Both providers place high importance on data privacy and security.

Koofr is based in EU member state Slovenia, and all its data centers are located in the EU as well. This means it is regulated by and compliant with the GDPR. What does this mean?

Well, Koofr has a strict no-tracking policy. It doesn't use any pixels or cookies to track you on its site and around the web. This is something you can easily test by using your browser's Inspect feature. Only data needed to provide the cloud storage service is collected, nothing more.

In line with its philosophy of transparency, Koofr has also broken down its Privacy Policy into easy-to-understand bullet points.

As for Icedrive - even though it is based in the UK, they've been around long enough to ensure GDPR compliance in spite of potential changes related to Brexit. The option to download or delete collected personal data is supported in-app, and the company has an opt-in approach to all communications (except system notifications). However, as some of their servers are located in the US, they also need to comply with US laws such as DMCA.

Like Koofr, Icedrive also does not use third-party trackers like Google Analytics.

Though it's easily accessible in its legal center, Icedrive's Privacy Policy is not the most user-friendly.

Verdict: Both providers have a similar approach to privacy, with some minor differences in implementation.

Security and encryption

Privacy-oriented cloud storage enthusiasts have debated whether to favor client-side or server-side encryption. There are benefits and drawbacks to each approach, and solutions vary across the industry.

Let's clear up some terms first. Server-side encryption simply means that data is encrypted the moment a data package leaves your computer, not before. Nobody can access the data without your private key (your user password), but there are mechanisms that allow you to recover your account in case you lose it.

The main disadvantage of server-side encryption is that if a third party somehow gains access to your account, they can access all of your files. We wrote a few tips on how to prevent this.

With client-side encryption, the difference is that the data is encrypted before it is handed off to the server. This means that the server cannot access the encrypted content - the provider technically cannot see what you've uploaded. This concept is also called zero-knowledge encryption.

The downside of the zero-knowledge encryption approach is that in case you forget or lose your password, your data will be permanently lost. There is no way of retrieving it. Zero-knowledge encryption also doesn't allow for block-level sync.

Back to our comparison. Icedrive offers client-side encryption as a paid feature available with all paid subscription plans.

Koofr believes in full transparency, so only implementation of strong, open source encryption was acceptable for us. A closed-source encryption system as embedded by other competitors leaves users with no way of verifying it actually works as intended. This is why we designed Koofr Vault, our client-side encrypted folder, to be completely open source (see our GitHub here) and completely compatible with the open source command-line tool rclone, which has been the go-to method for client-side encryption with Koofr until now.

Imagine Koofr Vault and rclone as a pair of x-ray glasses that can wrap your stuff in untearable, impenetrable wrapping paper. You can use either of them interchangably, or use any other rclone-compatible encryption application to access your encrypted files. All you need is the config information, including your Salt and Safe Key.

Verdict: Icedrive offers closed-source client-side encryption as a paid add-on while Koofr includes open source client-side encryption for all plans, including free.

Connectivity and integrations

While Koofr and Icedrive have been found to be relatively equal so far in this comparison, connectivity and integrated services are where their paths diverge.

One of Koofr's unique features is the option to connect your Dropbox, Google Drive, or Microsoft OneDrive to your cloud storage and manage files directly. The unified search engine allows you to search for files and documents across all connected accounts.

With Koofr's Microsoft Office for the web solution, paid account users can work on their Office documents in the browser, without installing extra software. Koofr is also one of the few trusted services you can choose to download your data in Facebook's Data Transfer Tool.

You can also connect various third-party applications to Koofr via WebDAV and allow them to access your cloud storage directly. Some open-source examples include the Zotero citation management tool, the KeePassXC password vault software, and the Joplin note-taking app.

Icedrive currently does not feature any plugins or integrations. WebDAV is available only to paid users.

Verdict: Koofr offers a variety of connectivity options and integrations while with Icedrive, this is very limited.

Usability and features

Many features we've come to expect from cloud storage providers are supported by both Koofr and Icedrive. Some examples include versioning, sharing files with users and via public links, and a similarly organized dashboard. Both products have a modern, clean design and similar user experience, and they are accessible across various devices (mobile, desktop, web app).

Features that give Koofr an edge include the following:

• the ability to create and edit files in the cloud (.txt, .docx, .pptx, .xlsx files)
• online image editor
• powerful keyboard shortcuts
• local folders allow you to access and share files from your remote computer directly, without transferring them to Koofr (paid accounts only)

Features that give Icedrive an edge include:

• offers more 2FA options including FIDO/U2F keys and SMS/text messaging
• preserves last modified timestamps of files uploaded by drag-and-drop*

*Note: Koofr preserves timestamps in syncs or uploads via rclone or webDAV, currently not on web and mobile upload

Verdict: Koofr offers more powerful features.

Conclusion

Choosing between Koofr and Icedrive may be tough, as they are both solid services that value their users' privacy very highly. Many of their core cloud storage features are similar, too.

In the end, it comes down to a trade-off: Icedrive is slightly more affordable but offers no productivity or connectivity features. It is relatively new on the market, having launched about 3 years ago as of this writing.

On the other hand, Koofr's price point reflects a realistic cost required to support an independent, profitable company with a 10-year track record and a team of experts dedicated to continuous product development and growth. This is completely in line with Koofr's philosophy of transparency. Koofr's cloud storage service is feature-rich, so users really get the most bang for their buck while staying in control of their data privacy.

If you're looking for a powerful productivity toolset, connectivity at your fingertips, and tailored and easily expandable storage space, why not give Koofr a try?

Want to talk to us? Join us on the Koofr subreddit!